Author: Fajri Matahati Muhammadin

British Parliamentary offers a very huge challenge for both debaters and adjudicators. So much more strategic and tactical considerations should be made beside simple argumentative comparisson. Four teams to compare qualitatively is definitely heavier than just finding the better of two. Instead of “win” or “lose”, they have Rank 1-4 (I usually say this as

I was adjudicating in a panel one day, in NineCity (SMA 9 Yk Debating Competition). One team won unanimously. Glad that we didnt need to dispute about anything (not that it would matter anyway, but its just cool to be unanimous), I asked of the margins of my fellows. One of my panelist gave 1

I was adjudicating in a panel one day, in NineCity (SMA 9 Yk Debating Competition). One team won unanimously. Glad that we didnt need to dispute about anything (not that it would matter anyway, but its just cool to be unanimous), I asked of the margins of my fellows. One of my panelist gave 1

Just a while ago, the kids I train (SMA 9 Yogyakarta) lost a debate round in Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta because their definition was truistic. Hearing the story, I really think that I dont agree with it and I think that my kids were violated here. – Well, I am not suggesting that the adjudicator sucks.

Oh kekasihku, kembalilah padaku Jauhnya engkau dariku amat sakit Demi Allah, engkaulah nafasku Kian jauh engkau, kian sesak aku dalam gelap – Oh kekasihku, jangan tinggalkan aku Tanpamu aku kian lemah Engkaulah sumber api bagi jiwa dan ragaku Engkaulah penghidup urat-urat nadiku – Oh kekasihku, aku makin dalam tenggelam Bebasmu sangat jauh disana, dan dekatmu